
Fumi
Small farmer- Wants
- This year's harvest and the farm's survival
- Fears
- Conserving alone while others pump
“If I stop alone while others pump, my farm still loses.”
SOLO MYSTERY · 4–7 MIN
Rain has returned, yet the town's wells keep falling. You are a young investigator who can rewind the morning. Visit two sites, collect clues, and carry one memory into the next investigation. Across three mornings, connect the reasons a farmer, a factory operator, and a lender cannot act. Then use a limited budget to redesign the water rules and aim for a future in which all three choose to cooperate.
The one-memory limit is a game rule. Real investigations preserve all evidence.

Your path through the game
Each morning, choose two of five sites, reveal their evidence, revise your hypothesis, and carry one memory forward. Connect your three memories as natural change, people's choices, and institutions. With a budget of 4, choose one core rule and up to two supports. Compare the characters' choices with the old rules, and check water recovery, finance, and cost sharing.
Visit two sites each morning and carry one clue forward
Use three memories to connect falling water and people's choices
Redesign the rules and test all three characters' cooperation
The same morning looks different when you change where you investigate and which memory you keep. A rainfall explanation gives way as scattered clues connect. Changing one rule card lets you see whose reasons for cooperating change, making each revision an experiment you can understand.
Pumping gives one user an immediate benefit while the cost of falling water spreads across the region. Test explanations against evidence, then change rights, measurement, and repayment terms to change individual choices. Explore mechanism design by making cooperation worthwhile for each participant.
Who still chose to pump, and what did conservation cost that person? Did your remembered evidence support the rule you chose? Replay with different sites or support cards and check how a stronger explanation leads to a better design.

“If I stop alone while others pump, my farm still loses.”

“If everyone measures the same way, I can commit to cuts.”

“I can finance conservation if repayment can wait for results.”